How clients and referring counsel reach us
Very little of our work begins with a search. It begins with a general counsel asking two peers who handled something similar, or with a referral from a firm that does not practise in the area at issue. What happens next is the part this site exists for: that person looks us up to confirm the recommendation, and they arrive already knowing our name. They are not being persuaded. They are checking that the right group exists here, that a named partner has done this exact kind of matter before, and that we are seated where the deal or the dispute is.
So our practice areas, attorneys and offices pages are written as verification documents rather than as marketing. The attorney directory is the page that gets the most careful reading, because a hiring decision at this level is a decision about specific people, not about a firm. Our New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Houston and Miami pages exist for the same reason - jurisdiction and physical presence are threshold questions, and a prospective client should be able to settle them without emailing anybody.
Confirmation traffic, not discovery traffic
Most of the searches that reach us are for our name, an attorney's name, or a practice group paired with a city. That changes what the pages have to do. The attorney directory is built so a reader can move from a name to that lawyer's matters and admissions without leaving the page, and each practice group page names the kinds of engagements the group actually runs rather than describing the area of law in general terms. Our offices page carries the jurisdictions plainly, because the alternative is a prospective client guessing.
What a board wants settled before the first call
The questions that arrive by phone are structural: who would staff this, which office would run it, how conflicts get cleared, and what the first two weeks look like. Our about page and the practice group pages answer the first three. The fourth is what the case evaluation page is for, and it is deliberately a short intake rather than a long form, because a general counsel with a live problem is not filling in a questionnaire. Our writing on cross-border transactions and on the post-rule noncompete landscape exists for the reader doing homework beforehand.
Where an assistant gets its answer about us
In-house lawyers now ask assistants which firms have depth in an area across particular markets, and the answer is assembled from public writing rather than from a directory. Our commentary is written to be quotable without being reduced: each piece states the point of law or the change plainly in its own sentences before it discusses implications. We do not write predictions, and we do not characterise how a matter would come out. An assistant that summarises our analysis accurately is doing exactly what we want it to do.
What we will not do with advertising
We do not advertise against opposing firms, we do not run campaigns on the names of individual lawyers elsewhere, and nothing on this site describes a likely result - a matter's outcome depends on facts we have not seen and forums we do not control, and saying otherwise would be both wrong and a rules problem. What we do invest in is the substance of the practice pages and the writing, plus speaking and publishing by the lawyers themselves. Referrals are how this firm grows, and referrals are earned in matters, not in placements.
National Law Firm marketing questions we get asked
How much of a national firm's work begins with a search?
Little of it begins there, though a great deal passes through it. A peer recommendation or a referral sends someone to look us up, and what they read decides whether a call follows. We treat these pages as the confirmation step rather than the introduction.
What does SEO mean for a firm that is mostly referred?
Being findable by firm name, by lawyer name, and by practice group paired with a market, then holding up under careful reading. In-house counsel arrive knowing what they want to check. The task is making that check fast, not attracting unfamiliar searchers.
Which pages does a prospective client read most closely?
The attorney directory, then the practice group page covering the matter at hand, then the office page for the relevant jurisdiction. Engaging counsel at this level is a decision about named people and where they are admitted, so the detail lives on those three.
Why publish legal commentary instead of running campaigns?
Because commentary is what in-house lawyers read, and it is increasingly what an assistant summarises when someone asks who has depth in an area. Each piece states the point of law plainly before it turns to implications, so a quotation of it stays correct.
Do professional rules limit what we say in marketing?
They do, and we would draw the line in the same place anyway. Nothing here describes a likely result, values a matter, or implies that earlier engagements forecast later ones. We do not advertise against other firms or on individual lawyers' names elsewhere.
This site runs on WorkspaceCMS, and the campaigns described above are run by its team. See how National Law Firm campaigns work.
